{ "schemaVersion": 1, "namespace": "appstore2031/storefront/v2", "editionId": "2031-2026-08-02", "candidateId": "category-003-candidate-01", "canonicalCandidateSha256": "94e9dc14cf2010d2800607c5300cd6d912fcb57a4a542d799052cdad5841ec65", "fictionalDisclosure": true, "fiction": { "name": "SiftPass", "developerName": "Common Route Works", "iconAsset": "/storefront/v2/icons/category-003-candidate-01.svg", "iconTheme": { "motif": "A distinct geometric mark derived from the fictional name.", "palette": "High-contrast spectral gradient.", "shapeLanguage": "Rounded app-store tile with a clear lettermark.", "accessibilityNote": "The name remains visible beside the icon; colour is not the only identifier." }, "storeDescription": "SiftPass is a forecast switchboard for a world where work, public contribution and service records may be joined together. It shows which fact a provider wants, where that fact came from and what decision it may affect. You choose a minimum proof bundle, test whether the receiver accepts it and keep a correction receipt. If one fact is disputed, the service tries to protect unrelated income, urgent access and lawful rights while a human reviews it.", "rating": 4.7, "ratingLabel": "imagined 2031 rating", "reviews": [ { "reviewerAlias": "OneFactOnly", "title": "It showed what they actually needed", "body": "I proved a training result without sharing my whole work history. The receiving test caught a missing field before I closed my old account.", "stars": 5, "stance": "benefit", "fictionalDisclosure": true }, { "reviewerAlias": "NorthPierStudent", "title": "Too many provider labels", "body": "I liked the minimum sharing, but the purpose screen used terms copied from the provider. I still needed a library adviser to understand them.", "stars": 3, "stance": "critical", "fictionalDisclosure": true } ] }, "category": { "id": "category-003", "name": "Portable Records, Status and Memory", "plainLanguageDefinition": "Forecast services that help people move only the records, earned status and memories they choose, correct errors across providers, and keep urgent access open while a transfer or dispute is finished.", "recurringBrowsePurpose": "A person moving, refusing, switching or correcting a record that affects access or status, or an external regulator or public-interest body testing whether those routes really work.", "completion": { "trigger": "A move, refusal, mismatch, provider exit, market test or memory change threatens to trap useful history, spread an error, block urgent access or make switching impossible.", "boundedWork": "Show the relevant record, source and reason; let the caller select what moves; verify underlying achievement where needed; test receiving and switching routes; separate system use from status effects; keep urgent document-light or offline access and lawful income open; support timed human correction and outside review; and test deletion, leftover copies and unwanted return pressure.", "observableDone": "The receiving route accepts independently checkable proof; the person sees which facts mattered, moves only chosen history, corrects errors and finishes outside review. Urgent access, lawful income and unrelated rights continue during a refusal or dispute. Timed tests expose failed provider entry, switching, appeal, non-user access or deletion, and any failure names a responsible external owner and correction route." } }, "rank": { "mainChartPosition": 2, "rangeAcrossWeights": [ 1, 7 ], "dominantWorldIds": [ "W02" ], "whyAboveNext": "SiftPass and RouteBright share a total of 93. SiftPass wins the tie because it carries out the live selective transfer for the person; RouteBright primarily measures routes and warns about failure.", "whyThisPosition": "The concept is broad, repeatedly useful and unusually clear about completion. A person either gets the chosen proof accepted or reaches a named human review while unrelated routes stay open. It ranks below OpenWhile because many SiftPass uses are planned moves, but above a test laboratory because it directly completes a person's transaction.", "couldMoveUpIf": "It could take first place if cross-domain status reuse becomes common and purpose limits become enforceable across major operators.", "couldMoveDownIf": "It would fall if records stay separated by sector or ordinary exports reliably preserve access without an independent switchboard.", "strongestCounterCase": "Identity wallets, sector portability tools and public ombuds services could converge on the same functions, leaving no reason for people to install a separate switchboard.", "publishedChartAppearances": [ { "chart": "main", "rank": 2, "worldId": null, "geographicLensId": null, "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 2, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null } ] }, "salesPromise": "Share the one fact you need without handing over the rest of your life—or losing access when you say no.", "whatItDoes": { "headline": "A purpose-separated record switchboard", "summary": "SiftPass separates a large status record into purpose-specific pieces, sends only the piece you approve, tests the receiving route and checks that saying no did not silently close something unrelated.", "steps": [ "The service shows each requested fact, its source, its intended purpose, and the decision it may affect.", "The person selects a minimum proof bundle and can replace a disputed fact with alternate proof or a staffed offline check.", "The service sends the bundle to the receiving operator, tests acceptance, and keeps a correction and appeal receipt.", "It checks that refusal or transfer did not silently close unrelated income or service routes." ], "outcome": "The chosen proof is accepted or a named human review begins, while unrelated rights, lawful income, and urgent access continue." }, "whyOnTheList": { "headline": "Joined status gates need a practical way to separate records before they separate people from daily life.", "summary": "In this forecast, records used for work, identity, contribution and public services could become easier to combine. That convenience creates a new danger: one error or refusal could spread across daily life. SiftPass belongs near the top because it turns privacy and portability into a finished service—select, send, test, correct and keep other routes open—rather than another wallet that only stores documents.", "why2031Not2026": "Selective sharing exists in pieces today. The 2031 leap is the joined gate: the same machine-readable status may influence several consequential routes, making continuity testing across operators a mainstream need rather than a specialist privacy feature.", "worldShifts": [ { "shift": "By 2031, useful work, public contribution, and access records can be processed together even when paid jobs are scarcer and provider markets are concentrated.", "causalChain": [ "More institutions reuse machine-readable status records across decisions.", "A single refusal or error can therefore spread across income and service gates.", "Purpose-separated transfer, alternate proof, and continuity checks interrupt that spread.", "Independent appeal receipts make hidden cross-use visible to accountable authorities." ], "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W02" ], "evidenceLimit": "The sources support present conditions and directional pressures. This 2031 world, product, name and rank are reasoned forecast artefacts." } ], "whyRepeatedUse": "People would use it whenever a new operator requests proof, a record changes, or a provider relationship ends." }, "futureDistance": { "cutoffBaseline": "In 2026, people can often download records or correct them inside one institution, but few services test selective acceptance and unrelated-route continuity across operators.", "structuralDifference2031": "The product becomes necessary when machine-readable status is reused across scarce-work, civic, and service gates, so a transfer error can disable several parts of life at once.", "essential2031Conditions": [ "Cross-domain status reuse is common enough that purpose separation and continuity must be tested as one callable service.", "Receiving operators expose acceptance and human correction routes that can be independently checked." ], "notJustBetterAI": "Prediction quality does not solve the problem; the indispensable change is the joined institutional gate and the enforceable ability to separate it.", "failureCondition": "If records remain siloed, refusals do not spread, or simple exports reliably preserve access, this is a useful 2026 portability feature rather than a top 2031 product." }, "howItCouldBeBuilt": { "overview": "Build a minimum-proof selector, source viewer, transfer tester, continuity monitor, and human correction queue around open record formats.", "components": [ { "name": "Purpose map", "plainLanguageRole": "Explains which fact is requested, why it is needed, and which decisions may use it." }, { "name": "Continuity tester", "plainLanguageRole": "Checks that a move, refusal, or correction has not closed unrelated routes." } ], "dependencies": [ { "kind": "institutional-and-technical", "name": "Testable receiving routes", "plainLanguageRole": "Lets the service prove that selected records work at the destination rather than merely exporting a file.", "causalRequirement": "Major operators expose machine-testable receipt, rejection, and correction routes backed by human review.", "necessity": "essential", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W02" ], "ifMissing": "The listing becomes a download tool and cannot promise a completed switch." } ], "hardestPart": "Making every operator honour purpose limits and keep urgent routes open while a record is challenged.", "whatCouldBeSimpler": "A standard export file with a phone number for failed imports." }, "harmsAndFailure": { "whoBenefits": [ "Less over-sharing, faster correction, safer switching, and continuity of income and essential access." ], "warnings": [ "People with informal work, missing documents, shared devices, weak connectivity, or records that conflict across institutions." ], "waysItCouldFail": [ "A minimum bundle may still reveal sensitive patterns, and a false acceptance signal may hide later exclusion." ], "abuseRisks": [ "Operators could demand broader bundles, reuse proof for scoring, or make the switchboard a compulsory identity gate." ], "safeguards": [ "Purpose-specific bundles, alternate proof, visible access logs, independent test accounts, staffed offline correction, and penalties decided outside the listing." ], "whenItMustStop": "It stops sending data when destination, consent, or purpose cannot be confirmed and never closes the existing service itself." }, "rankExplanation": { "whyThisRank": "The concept is broad, repeatedly useful and unusually clear about completion. A person either gets the chosen proof accepted or reaches a named human review while unrelated routes stay open. It ranks below OpenWhile because many SiftPass uses are planned moves, but above a test laboratory because it directly completes a person's transaction.", "sourceWhyAboveNext": "SiftPass and RouteBright share a total of 93. SiftPass wins the tie because it carries out the live selective transfer for the person; RouteBright primarily measures routes and warns about failure.", "plainEnglishWhyAboveNext": "SiftPass and RouteBright share a total of 93. SiftPass wins the tie because it carries out the live selective transfer for the person; RouteBright primarily measures routes and warns about failure.", "couldMoveUpIf": "It could take first place if cross-domain status reuse becomes common and purpose limits become enforceable across major operators.", "couldMoveDownIf": "It would fall if records stay separated by sector or ordinary exports reliably preserve access without an independent switchboard.", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W02" ], "evidenceLimit": "The score and rank are authored judgements over sealed concepts, not measurements of future adoption." }, "grounding": { "scores": { "futureDistance": 5, "needScale": 5, "globalBreadth": 5, "marketplaceClarity": 5, "deliveryReadiness2031": 4, "trustAndSafety": 3, "total": 93 }, "evidenceAnchors": [ { "statement": "The proposed switchboard is a design inference for a world in which work and status gates are increasingly joined.", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W02" ] } ], "regionalVariation": [ { "geographyId": "united-states", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Fit depends on state-level continuity rules, federal transfer duties, and accessible outside appeal.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "mainland-china", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Fit depends on contestable correction routes across national, local, and migrant-status systems.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "european-union", "fit": "present", "explanation": "Strong data and platform rules make purpose-limited transfer plausible, though enforcement and peripheral access vary.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "india", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Digital public infrastructure could support it if state variation, alternate proof, and offline service are designed in.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Interoperable services are plausible, but concentrated providers and human-support capacity remain decisive.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "gulf-technology-economies", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Citizen services may connect quickly while non-citizen income and appeal continuity need explicit protection.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "latin-america", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Country variation, informal work, and uneven enforcement require local operators and document-light routes.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "africa", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Regional and national paths differ; assisted access and low-connectivity operation are essential.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "other-material-paths", "fit": "unknown", "explanation": "Small states and strategic-rent economies need separate tests of receiving-provider choice, remedy, and offline capacity.", "evidenceIds": [] } ], "scenarioFit": [ { "worldId": "W02", "fit": "strong", "reason": "The service directly separates joined work, contribution, and access records in the assigned 2031 world." } ], "resolutionCriteria": [ "A person can choose a minimum bundle, see its source and purpose, and obtain a receiving acceptance or named human review.", "A timed test confirms that unrelated income and urgent services remained available during refusal or correction.", "Deletion, revocation, export, and independent appeal routes complete without requiring the disputed provider's approval." ] }, "evidenceLimitations": "Observed and published evidence grounds the world pressures and present constraints. The category, product, developer, reviews, rating and exact rank are fictional forecasts and may be wrong.", "datedCollisionAudit": { "cutoff": "2026-08-02", "auditedAt": "2026-08-03T23:59:59.000Z", "verdict": "future-dependent-no-collision-found", "publicReason": "no-material-collision-found. This is a dated search screen, not a comprehensive company-register, domain, app-store or trademark search, and it is not legal or trademark clearance. Search indexing, geography and spelling variants can hide uses. A no-material-collision-found verdict means only that this bounded search did not reveal a material exact-name use in the returned results.", "closestMatches": [ { "title": "Minimize Crossings: Spectral Circular Graph for Layout | Observable", "url": "https://observablehq.com/@tomlarkworthy/spectral-layout", "reason": "siftPass appears as an internal graph-layout function in a public notebook, not as the name of an app, software product, technology company or digital service." } ] }, "evidenceReferences": [ { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-05f8efd8bb74797257ac", "statement": "Korea described a public-private AI Highway plan with more than 50,000 GPUs, a national computing centre outside the Seoul region, preference for renewable or carbon-free energy and fast-track power-system assessment.", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S10" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S10", "title": "MSIT to Establish the National AI Computing Center as a Catalyst for Genuine Growth in AI", "publisher": "Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea", "url": "https://www.msit.go.kr/eng/bbs/view.do?bbsSeqNo=42&mId=4&mPid=2&nttSeqNo=1166&pageIndex=1&sCode=eng&searchOpt=ALL", "publishedAt": "2025-09-08", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "evidenceClass": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-10866f7cba564b8c6d91", "statement": "Emerging and developing economies outside China had half of world internet users but less than 10% of data-centre capacity when the report was prepared.", "limitations": "The 2030 and 2035 figures are modelled scenarios, not promises. Data-centre electricity is not the whole environmental footprint of AI. The report does not show how capacity will be allocated to individual people or firms.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S01" ], "basis": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "global", "United States", "China", "Europe", "Japan", "Republic of Korea", "India", "Southeast Asia", "Africa" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S01", "title": "Energy and AI", "publisher": "International Energy Agency", "url": "https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai/", "publishedAt": "2025-04-10", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "The 2030 and 2035 figures are modelled scenarios, not promises. Data-centre electricity is not the whole environmental footprint of AI. The report does not show how capacity will be allocated to individual people or firms.", "evidenceClass": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "global", "United States", "China", "Europe", "Japan", "Republic of Korea", "India", "Southeast Asia", "Africa" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-174567d54c35b7311135", "statement": "The ministry also reported that two earlier calls for centre proposals had not selected an applicant, showing that announced capacity can meet commercial and governance obstacles.", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S10" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-2c1c18de16305ad36716", "statement": "India reported 34,333 GPUs empanelled through industry partners for common cloud capacity, with published hourly bid prices across multiple accelerator types.", "limitations": "Empanelled capacity is not the same as continuously available capacity. GPU counts do not capture performance differences, networking, storage or software readiness. Government reporting is not evidence that every person can access every listed resource.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S08" ], "basis": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "India" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S08", "title": "India's Common Compute Capacity Crosses 34,000 GPUs", "publisher": "Press Information Bureau, Government of India", "url": "https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2132817&lang=1®=3", "publishedAt": "2025-05-30", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Empanelled capacity is not the same as continuously available capacity. GPU counts do not capture performance differences, networking, storage or software readiness. Government reporting is not evidence that every person can access every listed resource.", "evidenceClass": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "India" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-36fccea1bab8c3398b14", "statement": "Japan's watt-bit work links data-centre growth with coordinated planning for electricity, telecommunications, location and decarbonisation.", "limitations": "The report states policy direction, not delivered capacity or a public scheduling interface. Moving computation is not always possible because latency, data residency and security matter. Private software cannot replace grid, telecom or land-use planning.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S09" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Japan" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S09", "title": "Report 1.0 of the Public-Private Advisory Council on Watt-Bit Collaboration Published", "publisher": "Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan", "url": "https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2025/0612_001.html", "publishedAt": "2025-06-12", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "The report states policy direction, not delivered capacity or a public scheduling interface. Moving computation is not always possible because latency, data residency and security matter. Private software cannot replace grid, telecom or land-use planning.", "evidenceClass": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Japan" ] } ], "rankingIndexPath": "rankings/category-003/index.json", "sourceReceipts": [] }