{ "schemaVersion": 1, "namespace": "appstore2031/storefront/v2", "editionId": "2031-2026-08-02", "candidateId": "category-003-candidate-03", "canonicalCandidateSha256": "b221178f29743535fd39fd0f9667593622f2ad1f5be046bb7cdb4602c1b6f811", "fictionalDisclosure": true, "fiction": { "name": "EarnedElsewhere", "developerName": "Open Merit Forge", "iconAsset": "/storefront/v2/icons/category-003-candidate-03.svg", "iconTheme": { "motif": "A distinct geometric mark derived from the fictional name.", "palette": "High-contrast spectral gradient.", "shapeLanguage": "Rounded app-store tile with a clear lettermark.", "accessibilityNote": "The name remains visible beside the icon; colour is not the only identifier." }, "storeDescription": "EarnedElsewhere is a forecast achievement passport built for work and learning that happened inside a closed AI platform. You select one claim, such as a skill, completed project or care contribution. An independent assessor reruns a narrow test, records the method and creates proof a new organisation can check. The passport carries no universal reputation score. It also tracks whether the receiver accepted the claim, requested a fair recheck or rejected it with a human appeal route.", "rating": 4.5, "ratingLabel": "imagined 2031 rating", "reviews": [ { "reviewerAlias": "BuiltItInside", "title": "My project survived the platform", "body": "The assessor reran the important part of my old project and gave the new workshop a proof they could understand without my full activity log.", "stars": 5, "stance": "benefit", "fictionalDisclosure": true }, { "reviewerAlias": "DifferentStandard", "title": "The receiver wanted another test", "body": "The proof was clear, but the licensing body still required its own assessment. I paid for a recheck that only shortened the interview.", "stars": 3, "stance": "critical", "fictionalDisclosure": true } ] }, "category": { "id": "category-003", "name": "Portable Records, Status and Memory", "plainLanguageDefinition": "Forecast services that help people move only the records, earned status and memories they choose, correct errors across providers, and keep urgent access open while a transfer or dispute is finished.", "recurringBrowsePurpose": "A person moving, refusing, switching or correcting a record that affects access or status, or an external regulator or public-interest body testing whether those routes really work.", "completion": { "trigger": "A move, refusal, mismatch, provider exit, market test or memory change threatens to trap useful history, spread an error, block urgent access or make switching impossible.", "boundedWork": "Show the relevant record, source and reason; let the caller select what moves; verify underlying achievement where needed; test receiving and switching routes; separate system use from status effects; keep urgent document-light or offline access and lawful income open; support timed human correction and outside review; and test deletion, leftover copies and unwanted return pressure.", "observableDone": "The receiving route accepts independently checkable proof; the person sees which facts mattered, moves only chosen history, corrects errors and finishes outside review. Urgent access, lawful income and unrelated rights continue during a refusal or dispute. Timed tests expose failed provider entry, switching, appeal, non-user access or deletion, and any failure names a responsible external owner and correction route." } }, "rank": { "mainChartPosition": 6, "rangeAcrossWeights": [ 3, 7 ], "dominantWorldIds": [ "W03" ], "whyAboveNext": "It sits above MemoryLifeboat because losing proof of an achievement can immediately block work or learning, while people can sometimes restart an AI relationship with a careful summary.", "whyThisPosition": "The need could be large and globally important, especially as roles and learning routes change. It ranks below PocketPassage because receiver trust in new proof methods will vary by occupation, culture and law, and because direct practical trials may sometimes be simpler. Its high score reflects the genuinely future-native problem, not a claim that one passport will fit everyone.", "couldMoveUpIf": "It could rise if closed providers become the dominant witnesses to work and major receivers accept transparent independent rechecks.", "couldMoveDownIf": "It would fall if practical trials, public credentials or strong issuer exports remain trusted enough without a new passport layer.", "strongestCounterCase": "Employers and learning bodies may prefer live demonstrations tailored to each role, making portable achievement proofs less useful than direct testing at the destination.", "publishedChartAppearances": [ { "chart": "main", "rank": 6, "worldId": null, "geographicLensId": null, "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 3, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null } ] }, "salesPromise": "Take proof of what you achieved—not your employer's secret score or your whole behaviour history.", "whatItDoes": { "headline": "A re-verifiable achievement passport", "summary": "EarnedElsewhere turns one trapped achievement into a narrow, independently rechecked proof that another employer, school or service can inspect without seeing your unrelated history.", "steps": [ "The person selects an achievement and sees the source work, assessment method, expiry, and limits behind it.", "Independent assessors recreate only the smallest verification needed, using a task sample, peer witness, or supervised check.", "The service issues a proof that contains the result and method but excludes unrelated behaviour and provider loyalty.", "A receiving organisation tests the proof and records acceptance, rejection, or a timed human review." ], "outcome": "The person can use an independently checkable achievement at a new destination without importing a whole reputation profile." }, "whyOnTheList": { "headline": "When enclosed platforms own the evidence of useful work, leaving can erase earned standing.", "summary": "This forecast allows for a 2031 in which powerful providers become the main witnesses to economically meaningful work, learning and contribution. Leaving such a provider could otherwise erase standing or force a person to share an invasive history. EarnedElsewhere belongs in the Top 10 because it offers a clear new transaction: choose a claim, re-prove it independently, carry it elsewhere and test whether the receiver truly accepts it.", "why2031Not2026": "Portfolios, references and digital credentials already move achievements. The future discontinuity is that much useful cognitive work may be visible mainly inside enclosed provider histories, while receivers need independent proof that does not depend on the original platform.", "worldShifts": [ { "shift": "By 2031, much cognitive work and learning may occur inside a few provider ecosystems whose internal records are hard for outsiders to inspect.", "causalChain": [ "Closed systems become the main witness to many tasks and learning events.", "Receiving organisations distrust a bare export from those systems.", "Small independent rechecks turn a provider claim into portable, method-labelled proof.", "Acceptance testing and appeal keep a failed proof from silently becoming permanent exclusion." ], "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W03" ], "evidenceLimit": "The sources support present conditions and directional pressures. This 2031 world, product, name and rank are reasoned forecast artefacts." } ], "whyRepeatedUse": "Achievements expire, roles change, and receiving organisations demand different proof, creating repeated verification events." }, "futureDistance": { "cutoffBaseline": "In 2026, portfolios, references, and digital credentials can move some achievements, but closed-system work is not routinely re-verifiable without the issuer.", "structuralDifference2031": "A large share of useful cognitive contribution is witnessed primarily by enclosed providers, making issuer-independent rechecks a mainstream access layer.", "essential2031Conditions": [ "Closed providers become primary witnesses to economically meaningful work or learning.", "Receivers require trustworthy proofs yet accept narrow independent rechecks." ], "notJustBetterAI": "Better credential matching is insufficient; the 2031 difference is that the original witness controls both the evidence and the switching barrier.", "failureCondition": "If ordinary portfolios and references remain enough, or receivers will not accept outside rechecks, the passport cannot become a top product." }, "howItCouldBeBuilt": { "overview": "Create a claim parser, minimum recheck library, assessor network, portable proof format, and receiving acceptance monitor.", "components": [ { "name": "Claim explainer", "plainLanguageRole": "Shows what was achieved, how it was judged, and what the claim does not prove." }, { "name": "Recheck studio", "plainLanguageRole": "Runs a small independent task or witness process sufficient to verify the selected claim." } ], "dependencies": [ { "kind": "institutional", "name": "Trusted narrow-assessment network", "plainLanguageRole": "Lets a claim survive when the original provider is unavailable or not trusted without recreating a full identity profile.", "causalRequirement": "Multiple accountable assessor types can issue comparable, method-labelled proofs with accessible appeal.", "necessity": "essential", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W03" ], "ifMissing": "The service only republishes provider claims and cannot remove provider lock-in." } ], "hardestPart": "Defining a proof narrow enough to protect privacy but strong enough for a receiver to rely on.", "whatCouldBeSimpler": "A reference letter plus a portfolio sample." }, "harmsAndFailure": { "whoBenefits": [ "Provider-independent standing, less disclosure, and a realistic route for people whose original issuer has failed." ], "warnings": [ "People with non-standard achievements, inaccessible assessment needs, informal witnesses, or work that cannot safely be sampled." ], "waysItCouldFail": [ "Rechecks may favour test-taking, expose confidential work, or create a costly second gate." ], "abuseRisks": [ "Receivers could demand ever broader proofs, assessors could sell favourable results, or platforms could punish people who seek outside verification." ], "safeguards": [ "Claim-specific limits, fee pooling, assessor rotation, conflict disclosure, accessible alternatives, audit samples, and acceptance appeals." ], "whenItMustStop": "It stops when a safe recheck cannot be designed or when the receiver seeks unrelated behavioural data." }, "rankExplanation": { "whyThisRank": "The need could be large and globally important, especially as roles and learning routes change. It ranks below PocketPassage because receiver trust in new proof methods will vary by occupation, culture and law, and because direct practical trials may sometimes be simpler. Its high score reflects the genuinely future-native problem, not a claim that one passport will fit everyone.", "sourceWhyAboveNext": "It sits above MemoryLifeboat because losing proof of an achievement can immediately block work or learning, while people can sometimes restart an AI relationship with a careful summary.", "plainEnglishWhyAboveNext": "It sits above MemoryLifeboat because losing proof of an achievement can immediately block work or learning, while people can sometimes restart an AI relationship with a careful summary.", "couldMoveUpIf": "It could rise if closed providers become the dominant witnesses to work and major receivers accept transparent independent rechecks.", "couldMoveDownIf": "It would fall if practical trials, public credentials or strong issuer exports remain trusted enough without a new passport layer.", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W03" ], "evidenceLimit": "The score and rank are authored judgements over sealed concepts, not measurements of future adoption." }, "grounding": { "scores": { "futureDistance": 5, "needScale": 5, "globalBreadth": 4, "marketplaceClarity": 5, "deliveryReadiness2031": 3, "trustAndSafety": 4, "total": 89 }, "evidenceAnchors": [ { "statement": "Independent re-verification is a design inference for an enclosed 2031 cognitive economy.", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W03" ] } ], "regionalVariation": [ { "geographyId": "united-states", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "A diverse assessor market is plausible, but state licensing and employer acceptance will vary.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "mainland-china", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Scale is possible through coordinated providers, while independent assessor authority requires careful design.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "european-union", "fit": "present", "explanation": "Credential, labour, and platform rules offer routes for limited proofs and appeal.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "india", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Large skills systems and state variation make low-cost local rechecks important.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Strong institutions may support acceptance, though ageing and accessibility needs change assessment delivery.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "gulf-technology-economies", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Citizen and migrant workers may face very different acceptance and appeal rights.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "latin-america", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Informal work and country-specific professional systems require varied witness and recheck methods.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "africa", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Assisted and offline assessment plus regional recognition are essential for broad fit.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "other-material-paths", "fit": "unknown", "explanation": "Imported platforms, small labour markets, and document exclusion create distinct proof needs.", "evidenceIds": [] } ], "scenarioFit": [ { "worldId": "W03", "fit": "strong", "reason": "It breaks the link between provider enclosure and earned standing in the assigned world." } ], "resolutionCriteria": [ "A selected claim is independently rechecked with a visible method and limits.", "A receiving organisation accepts it or begins a timed human appeal.", "No unrelated provider loyalty, private behaviour, or full-history record is required." ] }, "evidenceLimitations": "Observed and published evidence grounds the world pressures and present constraints. The category, product, developer, reviews, rating and exact rank are fictional forecasts and may be wrong.", "datedCollisionAudit": { "cutoff": "2026-08-02", "auditedAt": "2026-08-03T23:59:59.000Z", "verdict": "future-dependent-no-collision-found", "publicReason": "no-material-collision-found. This is a dated search screen, not a comprehensive company-register, domain, app-store or trademark search, and it is not legal or trademark clearance. Search indexing, geography and spelling variants can hide uses. A no-material-collision-found verdict means only that this bounded search did not reveal a material exact-name use in the returned results.", "closestMatches": [] }, "evidenceReferences": [ { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-05f8efd8bb74797257ac", "statement": "Korea described a public-private AI Highway plan with more than 50,000 GPUs, a national computing centre outside the Seoul region, preference for renewable or carbon-free energy and fast-track power-system assessment.", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S10" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S10", "title": "MSIT to Establish the National AI Computing Center as a Catalyst for Genuine Growth in AI", "publisher": "Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea", "url": "https://www.msit.go.kr/eng/bbs/view.do?bbsSeqNo=42&mId=4&mPid=2&nttSeqNo=1166&pageIndex=1&sCode=eng&searchOpt=ALL", "publishedAt": "2025-09-08", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "evidenceClass": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-10866f7cba564b8c6d91", "statement": "Emerging and developing economies outside China had half of world internet users but less than 10% of data-centre capacity when the report was prepared.", "limitations": "The 2030 and 2035 figures are modelled scenarios, not promises. Data-centre electricity is not the whole environmental footprint of AI. The report does not show how capacity will be allocated to individual people or firms.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S01" ], "basis": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "global", "United States", "China", "Europe", "Japan", "Republic of Korea", "India", "Southeast Asia", "Africa" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S01", "title": "Energy and AI", "publisher": "International Energy Agency", "url": "https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai/", "publishedAt": "2025-04-10", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "The 2030 and 2035 figures are modelled scenarios, not promises. Data-centre electricity is not the whole environmental footprint of AI. The report does not show how capacity will be allocated to individual people or firms.", "evidenceClass": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "global", "United States", "China", "Europe", "Japan", "Republic of Korea", "India", "Southeast Asia", "Africa" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-174567d54c35b7311135", "statement": "The ministry also reported that two earlier calls for centre proposals had not selected an applicant, showing that announced capacity can meet commercial and governance obstacles.", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S10" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-2c1c18de16305ad36716", "statement": "India reported 34,333 GPUs empanelled through industry partners for common cloud capacity, with published hourly bid prices across multiple accelerator types.", "limitations": "Empanelled capacity is not the same as continuously available capacity. GPU counts do not capture performance differences, networking, storage or software readiness. Government reporting is not evidence that every person can access every listed resource.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S08" ], "basis": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "India" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S08", "title": "India's Common Compute Capacity Crosses 34,000 GPUs", "publisher": "Press Information Bureau, Government of India", "url": "https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2132817&lang=1®=3", "publishedAt": "2025-05-30", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Empanelled capacity is not the same as continuously available capacity. GPU counts do not capture performance differences, networking, storage or software readiness. Government reporting is not evidence that every person can access every listed resource.", "evidenceClass": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "India" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-36fccea1bab8c3398b14", "statement": "Japan's watt-bit work links data-centre growth with coordinated planning for electricity, telecommunications, location and decarbonisation.", "limitations": "The report states policy direction, not delivered capacity or a public scheduling interface. Moving computation is not always possible because latency, data residency and security matter. Private software cannot replace grid, telecom or land-use planning.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S09" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Japan" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S09", "title": "Report 1.0 of the Public-Private Advisory Council on Watt-Bit Collaboration Published", "publisher": "Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan", "url": "https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2025/0612_001.html", "publishedAt": "2025-06-12", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "The report states policy direction, not delivered capacity or a public scheduling interface. Moving computation is not always possible because latency, data residency and security matter. Private software cannot replace grid, telecom or land-use planning.", "evidenceClass": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Japan" ] } ], "rankingIndexPath": "rankings/category-003/index.json", "sourceReceipts": [] }