{ "schemaVersion": 1, "namespace": "appstore2031/storefront/v2", "editionId": "2031-2026-08-02", "candidateId": "category-003-candidate-12", "canonicalCandidateSha256": "a0ff41d496f671e3d577f8ee4a99753cb36625352ed4bb90b962a043cb87e660", "fictionalDisclosure": true, "fiction": { "name": "StewardMesh", "developerName": "Neighbour Grid Federation", "iconAsset": "/storefront/v2/icons/category-003-candidate-12.svg", "iconTheme": { "motif": "A distinct geometric mark derived from the fictional name.", "palette": "High-contrast spectral gradient.", "shapeLanguage": "Rounded app-store tile with a clear lettermark.", "accessibilityNote": "The name remains visible beside the icon; colour is not the only identifier." }, "storeDescription": "StewardMesh is a forecast network of trained human stewards connected by shared proof methods. Bring one achievement that is trapped inside a closed provider: a project, skill, care task or community contribution. Your steward helps gather minimum evidence, arranges a narrow practical recheck and sends the result through an independent federation review. They then test the receiving route and remain your named contact for correction or appeal, without claiming authority to grant a job, licence or right.", "rating": 4.6, "ratingLabel": "imagined 2031 rating", "reviews": [ { "reviewerAlias": "NoSignalWorkshop", "title": "A person stayed with the case", "body": "My steward watched me repeat the repair, explained the proof and called the receiver when its import failed. I was not sent back to a bot.", "stars": 5, "stance": "benefit", "fictionalDisclosure": true }, { "reviewerAlias": "AcrossTwoRegions", "title": "Recognition changed at the border", "body": "The local proof was careful, but the receiving federation used a different method. A second review fixed it, although the process took weeks.", "stars": 3, "stance": "critical", "fictionalDisclosure": true } ] }, "category": { "id": "category-003", "name": "Portable Records, Status and Memory", "plainLanguageDefinition": "Forecast services that help people move only the records, earned status and memories they choose, correct errors across providers, and keep urgent access open while a transfer or dispute is finished.", "recurringBrowsePurpose": "A person moving, refusing, switching or correcting a record that affects access or status, or an external regulator or public-interest body testing whether those routes really work.", "completion": { "trigger": "A move, refusal, mismatch, provider exit, market test or memory change threatens to trap useful history, spread an error, block urgent access or make switching impossible.", "boundedWork": "Show the relevant record, source and reason; let the caller select what moves; verify underlying achievement where needed; test receiving and switching routes; separate system use from status effects; keep urgent document-light or offline access and lawful income open; support timed human correction and outside review; and test deletion, leftover copies and unwanted return pressure.", "observableDone": "The receiving route accepts independently checkable proof; the person sees which facts mattered, moves only chosen history, corrects errors and finishes outside review. Urgent access, lawful income and unrelated rights continue during a refusal or dispute. Timed tests expose failed provider entry, switching, appeal, non-user access or deletion, and any failure names a responsible external owner and correction route." } }, "rank": { "mainChartPosition": 8, "rangeAcrossWeights": [ 6, 9 ], "dominantWorldIds": [ "W03" ], "whyAboveNext": "It ranks above CopyWake because a named steward can complete a bounded proof journey, while proving that every distributed copy is truly gone remains technically and legally uncertain.", "whyThisPosition": "StewardMesh offers a strong safety boundary and a meaningful route for people underserved by remote systems. It ranks eighth because training, consistency, funding and federation capture are difficult, and the right local institution will differ greatly across nine geographic lenses. It remains above distributed deletion because its human accountability and finished receiver journey are easier to understand and govern.", "couldMoveUpIf": "It could rise if closed-provider achievements spread while remote proof systems repeatedly exclude people who need assisted or offline routes.", "couldMoveDownIf": "It would fall if national credential bodies or safe remote assessors provide trusted re-verification more consistently and cheaply.", "strongestCounterCase": "A small number of public credential bodies may deliver more consistent recognition and appeal than a local federation, which could vary in quality or be captured by powerful members.", "publishedChartAppearances": [ { "chart": "main", "rank": 8, "worldId": null, "geographicLensId": null, "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W03", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 8, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W06", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null } ] }, "salesPromise": "Sit with a real local steward who can re-prove your achievement and stay responsible until it is accepted.", "whatItDoes": { "headline": "A federated neighbourhood proof-steward service", "summary": "StewardMesh pairs a person with an accountable nearby steward who rechecks one achievement, creates a narrow portable proof, tests receiver acceptance and helps with correction.", "steps": [ "A local steward helps the person select one claim and understand its source, limits, and privacy risks.", "The steward gathers the smallest independent check through a practical sample, local witness, licensed assessor, or supervised task.", "A separate federation node reviews the method and issues a portable proof without provider loyalty or behavioural history.", "The receiving organisation tests the proof, while the local steward handles correction, offline continuity, and outside appeal." ], "outcome": "The person leaves with a narrow independently checkable proof and a human steward who remains responsible for completing the receiving route." }, "whyOnTheList": { "headline": "People need durable human responsibility when their achievements are trapped inside machine-run provider histories.", "summary": "A highly automated 2031 could still need physical access, local language and human responsibility. Remote proof systems may work poorly for people with missing documents, weak connectivity or achievements that only make sense in context. StewardMesh makes the list because it combines machine-checkable receipts with a named person who stays through the receiving journey. That could make portability practical beyond well-connected users, rather than merely available on paper.", "why2031Not2026": "Advisers, assessors and credential services perform parts of this work now. The 2031 difference is a federated service responsible from rechecking closed-platform evidence through machine-readable transfer, receiver testing and appeal across a wider provider economy.", "worldShifts": [ { "shift": "In 2031, enclosed cognitive-service firms may be the main witness to work and learning while local institutions still hold trust, physical access, and contextual knowledge.", "causalChain": [ "Closed providers hold detailed task evidence but outsiders distrust or cannot interpret it.", "A person cannot safely move the whole provider history to prove one achievement.", "A local steward organises a narrow recheck and a separate federation node reviews the method.", "Receiving tests and independent appeal make the proof portable without giving the federation final authority." ], "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W03" ], "evidenceLimit": "The sources support present conditions and directional pressures. This 2031 world, product, name and rank are reasoned forecast artefacts." } ], "whyRepeatedUse": "People return for new claims, expiry, changed receivers, provider failures, and corrections to earlier proofs." }, "futureDistance": { "cutoffBaseline": "In 2026, advisers, assessors, and credential services perform separate pieces but rarely stay responsible from selective evidence through receiving tests and appeal.", "structuralDifference2031": "Closed AI providers become major witnesses to achievement while durable physical and local trust remain necessary for people excluded from remote automated proof.", "essential2031Conditions": [ "Economically important achievements are trapped in provider histories that receivers distrust.", "Local stewards can be federated, independently reviewed, and recognised without gaining public authority." ], "notJustBetterAI": "The essential difference is a distributed accountable service model joining local physical trust to cross-provider acceptance, not improved automated verification.", "failureCondition": "If providers issue widely trusted narrow proofs or remote assessors serve everyone safely, the steward federation adds avoidable cost." }, "howItCouldBeBuilt": { "overview": "Train local stewards, publish narrow recheck methods, separate local evidence from federation review, and connect proof receipts to receiving and appeal routes.", "components": [ { "name": "Local stewardship desk", "plainLanguageRole": "Helps a person choose, evidence, correct, and carry one claim through the whole move." }, { "name": "Federated method review", "plainLanguageRole": "Checks that no single steward can issue unchecked proof or build a universal profile." } ], "dependencies": [ { "kind": "service-network-and-institutional", "name": "Recognised accountable steward federation", "plainLanguageRole": "Combines local physical access with independent method review and a receiver-facing correction route.", "causalRequirement": "Receivers recognise scoped federation proofs and each steward carries insured, auditable responsibility for the promised service steps.", "necessity": "essential", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W03" ], "ifMissing": "Local help cannot produce portable receiver trust, while a remote proof service loses the intended service-model difference." } ], "hardestPart": "Maintaining consistent receiver trust without flattening local evidence or allowing federation capture.", "whatCouldBeSimpler": "Ask a local adviser to help assemble a portfolio and contact the receiver." }, "harmsAndFailure": { "whoBenefits": [ "Human continuity, provider-independent achievement proof, less disclosure, and genuine offline access." ], "warnings": [ "People in places with weak steward coverage, people rejected by local majorities, and those whose work cannot be safely sampled." ], "waysItCouldFail": [ "Local bias or capture may shape evidence, while uneven steward quality can make proofs geographically unequal." ], "abuseRisks": [ "Stewards may sell favourable proofs, reveal community information, collude with receivers, or pressure people to join a local institution." ], "safeguards": [ "Choice of steward, separate federation review, random audit, conflict disclosure, safe remote alternatives, fee caps, and outside appeal." ], "whenItMustStop": "The steward stops when evidence would endanger someone, exceeds scope, or cannot be independently reviewed." }, "rankExplanation": { "whyThisRank": "StewardMesh offers a strong safety boundary and a meaningful route for people underserved by remote systems. It ranks eighth because training, consistency, funding and federation capture are difficult, and the right local institution will differ greatly across nine geographic lenses. It remains above distributed deletion because its human accountability and finished receiver journey are easier to understand and govern.", "sourceWhyAboveNext": "It ranks above CopyWake because a named steward can complete a bounded proof journey, while proving that every distributed copy is truly gone remains technically and legally uncertain.", "plainEnglishWhyAboveNext": "It ranks above CopyWake because a named steward can complete a bounded proof journey, while proving that every distributed copy is truly gone remains technically and legally uncertain.", "couldMoveUpIf": "It could rise if closed-provider achievements spread while remote proof systems repeatedly exclude people who need assisted or offline routes.", "couldMoveDownIf": "It would fall if national credential bodies or safe remote assessors provide trusted re-verification more consistently and cheaply.", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W03" ], "evidenceLimit": "The score and rank are authored judgements over sealed concepts, not measurements of future adoption." }, "grounding": { "scores": { "futureDistance": 5, "needScale": 4, "globalBreadth": 4, "marketplaceClarity": 5, "deliveryReadiness2031": 3, "trustAndSafety": 4, "total": 85 }, "evidenceAnchors": [ { "statement": "Federated local re-verification is a design inference for the assigned enclosed 2031 cognitive economy.", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W03" ] } ], "regionalVariation": [ { "geographyId": "united-states", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Plural local institutions support the model, though state licensing and coverage differ.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "mainland-china", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "A locally delivered service may need federation through authorised institutions rather than an independent civic network.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "european-union", "fit": "present", "explanation": "Professional recognition, local public services, and mobility rules offer several federation paths.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "india", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Large local networks are an advantage if state variation, caste, language, and rural access safeguards are explicit.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Strong local institutions help, while ageing and rural populations make accessible stewardship central.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "gulf-technology-economies", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Fast institutional adoption is possible, but migrant workers need independent steward choice and appeal.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "latin-america", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Local associations and informal-work evidence fit the model, with substantial country variation.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "africa", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Local trust and assisted access are strengths, but sustainable training and cross-border recognition are uncertain.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "other-material-paths", "fit": "unknown", "explanation": "Small-state and imported-provider settings may lack enough independent nodes to prevent capture.", "evidenceIds": [] } ], "scenarioFit": [ { "worldId": "W03", "fit": "strong", "reason": "Local accountable stewardship supplies a materially different service model for portable achievement in the assigned enclosed economy." } ], "resolutionCriteria": [ "A local steward completes one narrow recheck with independent federation review and visible limits.", "A receiver accepts the proof or starts a timed human appeal while unrelated access continues.", "The person can change steward, correct, export, delete, and reach outside authority without losing standing." ] }, "evidenceLimitations": "Observed and published evidence grounds the world pressures and present constraints. The category, product, developer, reviews, rating and exact rank are fictional forecasts and may be wrong.", "datedCollisionAudit": { "cutoff": "2026-08-02", "auditedAt": "2026-08-03T23:59:59.000Z", "verdict": "future-dependent-no-collision-found", "publicReason": "no-material-collision-found. This is a dated search screen, not a comprehensive company-register, domain, app-store or trademark search, and it is not legal or trademark clearance. Search indexing, geography and spelling variants can hide uses. A no-material-collision-found verdict means only that this bounded search did not reveal a material exact-name use in the returned results.", "closestMatches": [] }, "evidenceReferences": [ { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-05f8efd8bb74797257ac", "statement": "Korea described a public-private AI Highway plan with more than 50,000 GPUs, a national computing centre outside the Seoul region, preference for renewable or carbon-free energy and fast-track power-system assessment.", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S10" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S10", "title": "MSIT to Establish the National AI Computing Center as a Catalyst for Genuine Growth in AI", "publisher": "Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea", "url": "https://www.msit.go.kr/eng/bbs/view.do?bbsSeqNo=42&mId=4&mPid=2&nttSeqNo=1166&pageIndex=1&sCode=eng&searchOpt=ALL", "publishedAt": "2025-09-08", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "evidenceClass": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-10866f7cba564b8c6d91", "statement": "Emerging and developing economies outside China had half of world internet users but less than 10% of data-centre capacity when the report was prepared.", "limitations": "The 2030 and 2035 figures are modelled scenarios, not promises. Data-centre electricity is not the whole environmental footprint of AI. The report does not show how capacity will be allocated to individual people or firms.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S01" ], "basis": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "global", "United States", "China", "Europe", "Japan", "Republic of Korea", "India", "Southeast Asia", "Africa" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S01", "title": "Energy and AI", "publisher": "International Energy Agency", "url": "https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai/", "publishedAt": "2025-04-10", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "The 2030 and 2035 figures are modelled scenarios, not promises. Data-centre electricity is not the whole environmental footprint of AI. The report does not show how capacity will be allocated to individual people or firms.", "evidenceClass": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "global", "United States", "China", "Europe", "Japan", "Republic of Korea", "India", "Southeast Asia", "Africa" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-174567d54c35b7311135", "statement": "The ministry also reported that two earlier calls for centre proposals had not selected an applicant, showing that announced capacity can meet commercial and governance obstacles.", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S10" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-2c1c18de16305ad36716", "statement": "India reported 34,333 GPUs empanelled through industry partners for common cloud capacity, with published hourly bid prices across multiple accelerator types.", "limitations": "Empanelled capacity is not the same as continuously available capacity. GPU counts do not capture performance differences, networking, storage or software readiness. Government reporting is not evidence that every person can access every listed resource.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S08" ], "basis": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "India" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S08", "title": "India's Common Compute Capacity Crosses 34,000 GPUs", "publisher": "Press Information Bureau, Government of India", "url": "https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2132817&lang=1®=3", "publishedAt": "2025-05-30", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Empanelled capacity is not the same as continuously available capacity. GPU counts do not capture performance differences, networking, storage or software readiness. Government reporting is not evidence that every person can access every listed resource.", "evidenceClass": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "India" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-36fccea1bab8c3398b14", "statement": "Japan's watt-bit work links data-centre growth with coordinated planning for electricity, telecommunications, location and decarbonisation.", "limitations": "The report states policy direction, not delivered capacity or a public scheduling interface. Moving computation is not always possible because latency, data residency and security matter. Private software cannot replace grid, telecom or land-use planning.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S09" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Japan" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S09", "title": "Report 1.0 of the Public-Private Advisory Council on Watt-Bit Collaboration Published", "publisher": "Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan", "url": "https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2025/0612_001.html", "publishedAt": "2025-06-12", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "The report states policy direction, not delivered capacity or a public scheduling interface. Moving computation is not always possible because latency, data residency and security matter. Private software cannot replace grid, telecom or land-use planning.", "evidenceClass": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Japan" ] } ], "rankingIndexPath": "rankings/category-003/index.json", "sourceReceipts": [] }