{ "schemaVersion": 1, "namespace": "appstore2031/storefront/v2", "editionId": "2031-2026-08-02", "candidateId": "category-004-candidate-06", "canonicalCandidateSha256": "c0039ccb2709b0f7d935026ba8db7178a916d99df43cba9bca91c6b8caf09ce3", "fictionalDisclosure": true, "fiction": { "name": "CareKeel", "developerName": "Kindred Minimum Services", "iconAsset": "/storefront/v2/icons/category-004-candidate-06.svg", "iconTheme": { "motif": "A distinct geometric mark derived from the fictional name.", "palette": "High-contrast spectral gradient.", "shapeLanguage": "Rounded app-store tile with a clear lettermark.", "accessibilityNote": "The name remains visible beside the icon; colour is not the only identifier." }, "storeDescription": "CareKeel protects an already authorised care plan when scheduling, identity, prescriptions, payment, transport or communications fail together. A nearby team can deliver the agreed minimum—such as a medicine handoff, essential visit or safe transport—or connect the person to a named professional escalation. It never makes a clinical decision. Every action has a correctable continuity record, and patients, disabled people, older residents and carers can see who owns the next step.", "rating": 4.7, "ratingLabel": "imagined 2031 rating", "reviews": [ { "reviewerAlias": "CarerOnOakRoad", "title": "Someone owned the missed visit", "body": "The normal roster vanished, but CareKeel sent the approved backup worker and showed my dad's next medicine handoff clearly.", "stars": 5, "stance": "benefit", "fictionalDisclosure": true }, { "reviewerAlias": "NightNurse44", "title": "The limits need to stay obvious", "body": "The relay helped, but one family thought it could change the plan. Escalation must be faster when the authorised minimum is no longer safe.", "stars": 3, "stance": "critical", "fictionalDisclosure": true } ] }, "category": { "id": "category-004", "name": "Essential Local Access and Backup", "plainLanguageDefinition": "Services that make income and essentials reachable nearby, then keep a safe minimum moving when linked identity, payment, power, transport, communications or supply systems fail.", "recurringBrowsePurpose": "A resident, shop, frontline team, local service or public body in a place where ordinary delivery is weak, standard proof is missing, a corridor excludes people or linked systems have failed.", "completion": { "trigger": "A person or place cannot reliably reach local income or an essential service because delivery capacity, standard proof, a protected corridor or a linked system is missing or has failed.", "boundedWork": "Display the access route set by the responsible public body; provide staffed, affordable and document-light local delivery; keep power, transport, supplies and repair ready; separate alerts from checked local effects and give the next update; show external priority and correction routes; deliver the essential minimum during failure; and reconcile secure temporary records.", "observableDone": "People see the responsible body's route and reason, correct mistakes and reach affordable income, work opportunities, housing, water, climate safety, care or learning through staff and needed supplies. A priority rule shows its owner, reason, affected groups, end date and outside review. During failure, people without devices or standard documents receive the same essential minimum; each temporary action has an owner and reason; debts, duplicates and refusals reconcile; and results are reported by place and group." } }, "rank": { "mainChartPosition": 5, "rangeAcrossWeights": [ 1, 10 ], "dominantWorldIds": [ "W01" ], "whyAboveNext": "It is above AfterLedger because it prevents immediate physical harm during failure; record reconciliation becomes essential once the urgent care action is safe.", "whyThisPosition": "CareKeel places fifth with 90 because care is frequent, physical and time-sensitive across ageing and disabled populations. It sits below WaterMorrow on the tie-break because safe delegation varies by person and the harm from crossing into clinical judgement is severe.", "couldMoveUpIf": "It could rise if cross-provider continuity plans prove they reduce missed medicine, visits and transport without increasing unsafe handoffs.", "couldMoveDownIf": "It would fall if healthcare systems maintain independent safe fallbacks or if liability rules prevent local teams from acting on portable plans.", "strongestCounterCase": "Every additional handoff can create clinical risk. Providers may be safer hardening their own continuity than trusting a new relay with partial information and unclear liability.", "publishedChartAppearances": [ { "chart": "main", "rank": 5, "worldId": null, "geographicLensId": null, "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "united-states", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "mainland-china", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "european-union", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "india", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 4, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 7, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "gulf-technology-economies", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 10, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "latin-america", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 10, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "africa", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 1, "worldId": "W01", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 6, "worldId": "W02", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null }, { "chart": "conditional", "rank": 9, "worldId": "W05", "geographicLensId": "other-material-paths", "weightSetId": null } ] }, "salesPromise": "No silent cancellation: keep the agreed care minimum moving through an outage.", "whatItDoes": { "headline": "A local care minimum relay", "summary": "It executes only the actions already authorised in a person's continuity plan, using maintained local staff and supplies while clinical judgement stays with professionals.", "steps": [ "A staffed relay retrieves or opens the person's minimal portable continuity plan and confirms the responsible clinical or care authority.", "It arranges only pre-authorised medicines, supplies, transport, welfare checks or visits through available local providers.", "It issues receipts for every temporary action, escalates clinical uncertainty and reconciles provider and patient records after recovery." ], "outcome": "The person receives the authorised minimum or a named safe escalation, with no silent cancellation and a correctable continuity record." }, "whyOnTheList": { "headline": "Care continuity needs delegated action without delegated judgement", "summary": "Home care may become tightly linked to automated monitoring, scheduling, logistics and identity by 2031. That can make routine care more responsive, but it also makes correlated failure more dangerous. CareKeel is needed because a cancelled screen entry can become a missed medicine or human visit.", "why2031Not2026": "Emergency summaries, pharmacies, home-care rosters and patient transport usually fail over separately today. CareKeel requires providers to recognise one portable delegated-action plan when their routine systems have become much more interconnected.", "worldShifts": [ { "shift": "By 2031, home care may rely on joined scheduling, identity, logistics and automated monitoring, increasing the harm from correlated failure.", "causalChain": [ "A linked failure can turn several small administrative gaps into a missed medicine or visit.", "A minimal portable plan separates authorised continuity actions from unavailable systems.", "Receipts, escalation and reconciliation restore the care record and expose missed groups." ], "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W01" ], "evidenceLimit": "The sources support present conditions and directional pressures. This 2031 world, product, name and rank are reasoned forecast artefacts." } ], "whyRepeatedUse": "The relay supports routine plan checks and activates for each outage, provider failure or local disruption." }, "futureDistance": { "cutoffBaseline": "In 2026, emergency summaries, pharmacies, home-care rosters and patient transport usually fail over separately.", "structuralDifference2031": "The product relies on cross-provider recognition of a portable delegated-action plan because routine care systems have become more tightly joined.", "essential2031Conditions": [ "Portable action-level continuity plans recognised by multiple providers", "Pre-contracted local staff and supply reserves", "Safe offline reconciliation across clinical, care and payment systems" ], "notJustBetterAI": "AI cannot authorise care or deliver medicines; the causal change is governed delegation plus maintained physical capacity.", "failureCondition": "If each provider can independently maintain time-sensitive care through ordinary contingency plans, the relay is only a consolidated 2026 call centre." }, "howItCouldBeBuilt": { "overview": "Use a patient-held minimum plan, delegated-action catalogue, provider availability board, dispatch and offline receipts.", "components": [ { "name": "Continuity plan token", "plainLanguageRole": "Carries the smallest authorised care actions, contacts, cautions and consent needed during failure." }, { "name": "Care relay desk", "plainLanguageRole": "Finds an accredited person or supply route and records the handoff." } ], "dependencies": [ { "kind": "professional-institutional", "name": "Pre-authorised continuity delegation", "plainLanguageRole": "Defines exactly which non-judgement actions the relay may execute and when it must escalate.", "causalRequirement": "Plausible for narrow high-risk routines with professional governance.", "necessity": "essential", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W01" ], "ifMissing": "The relay either cannot act or dangerously crosses into clinical judgement." } ], "hardestPart": "Making the relay useful enough to prevent harm while never letting it make a clinical decision.", "whatCouldBeSimpler": "A call centre that tells patients to contact their usual provider." }, "harmsAndFailure": { "whoBenefits": [ "Time-sensitive authorised care continues through administrative and infrastructure failure." ], "warnings": [ "Patients with wrong portable plans", "Carers excluded from communication", "Remote residents served late" ], "waysItCouldFail": [ "Stale instructions could cause injury", "Sensitive health data could leak", "A minimum service could become the normal ceiling" ], "abuseRisks": [ "Impersonation to obtain supplies", "Providers dump difficult cases onto the relay", "Secondary use of continuity data" ], "safeguards": [ "Short-lived signed plans and human confirmation for risk tiers", "Minimum-data access logs and patient export", "Time-limited activation with outcome audits and mandatory return to full care" ], "whenItMustStop": "Stop an action and call the accountable professional or emergency service when plan integrity or safety is uncertain." }, "rankExplanation": { "whyThisRank": "CareKeel places fifth with 90 because care is frequent, physical and time-sensitive across ageing and disabled populations. It sits below WaterMorrow on the tie-break because safe delegation varies by person and the harm from crossing into clinical judgement is severe.", "sourceWhyAboveNext": "It is above AfterLedger because it prevents immediate physical harm during failure; record reconciliation becomes essential once the urgent care action is safe.", "plainEnglishWhyAboveNext": "It is above AfterLedger because it prevents immediate physical harm during failure; record reconciliation becomes essential once the urgent care action is safe.", "couldMoveUpIf": "It could rise if cross-provider continuity plans prove they reduce missed medicine, visits and transport without increasing unsafe handoffs.", "couldMoveDownIf": "It would fall if healthcare systems maintain independent safe fallbacks or if liability rules prevent local teams from acting on portable plans.", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W01" ], "evidenceLimit": "The score and rank are authored judgements over sealed concepts, not measurements of future adoption." }, "grounding": { "scores": { "futureDistance": 5, "needScale": 5, "globalBreadth": 5, "marketplaceClarity": 4, "deliveryReadiness2031": 4, "trustAndSafety": 3, "total": 90 }, "evidenceAnchors": [ { "statement": "The design infers value from a strict split between pre-authorised continuity actions and external professional judgement.", "basis": "design-inference", "evidenceIds": [], "worldIds": [ "W01" ] } ], "regionalVariation": [ { "geographyId": "united-states", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Fragmented providers and state rules make portability difficult but increase the need.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "mainland-china", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Strong coordinated delivery may help; migrant access and incident transparency need proof.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "european-union", "fit": "present", "explanation": "Patient rights and mutual assistance support the model, with national professional seams.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "india", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Large community-health networks help, while state capacity and identity coupling vary.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "japan-and-republic-of-korea", "fit": "present", "explanation": "Ageing populations and urban systems support demand; remote continuity and staffing remain exposed.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "gulf-technology-economies", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "City health logistics may be strong, provided migrant workers receive equal continuity and remedy.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "latin-america", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Community providers can deliver, but rural logistics and fragmented records may constrain coverage.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "africa", "fit": "conditional", "explanation": "Community health, radio and manual records help; power, supplies and national capacity vary.", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "geographyId": "other-material-paths", "fit": "unknown", "explanation": "Small-island, conflict and remote systems need distinct medicine, transport and authority evidence.", "evidenceIds": [] } ], "scenarioFit": [ { "worldId": "W01", "fit": "strong", "reason": "It provides a deliberately bounded human and physical fallback when joined care corridors fail." } ], "resolutionCriteria": [ "Every action traces to a current authorised plan and accountable professional.", "A disconnected drill completes the minimum without an unrecorded clinical substitution.", "Patients using offline routes receive equal correction and no silent cancellation." ] }, "evidenceLimitations": "Observed and published evidence grounds the world pressures and present constraints. The category, product, developer, reviews, rating and exact rank are fictional forecasts and may be wrong.", "datedCollisionAudit": { "cutoff": "2026-08-02", "auditedAt": "2026-08-03T23:59:59.000Z", "verdict": "future-dependent-no-collision-found", "publicReason": "no-material-collision-found. This is a search screen, not trademark or legal clearance. Search indexes are incomplete, regional and language coverage is uneven, snippets can be stale, and an unindexed or newly launched use may be missed. A no-material-collision-found verdict means only that this bounded search found no material exact-name use; it does not establish availability or ownership.", "closestMatches": [ { "title": "McDonald's at Carkeel Gateway", "url": "https://www.tellows.co.uk/num/01752844033", "reason": "The result is a near-match caused by the place name Carkeel and does not use the exact CareKeel name for any product, company or service." } ] }, "evidenceReferences": [ { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-05f8efd8bb74797257ac", "statement": "Korea described a public-private AI Highway plan with more than 50,000 GPUs, a national computing centre outside the Seoul region, preference for renewable or carbon-free energy and fast-track power-system assessment.", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S10" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S10", "title": "MSIT to Establish the National AI Computing Center as a Catalyst for Genuine Growth in AI", "publisher": "Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea", "url": "https://www.msit.go.kr/eng/bbs/view.do?bbsSeqNo=42&mId=4&mPid=2&nttSeqNo=1166&pageIndex=1&sCode=eng&searchOpt=ALL", "publishedAt": "2025-09-08", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "evidenceClass": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-15400ddd77cb4beb41fe", "statement": "IFR expected annual global installations to exceed 700,000 by 2028.", "limitations": "Industrial robots are mainly bounded machines in factories; they are not proof of general-purpose home robots. Installations do not measure autonomy, reliability, task breadth or person-level access. The 2028 number is an industry forecast and could change with investment and trade conditions.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S11" ], "basis": "modelled-projection", "geographies": [ "global", "China", "Japan", "Republic of Korea", "India", "European Union", "United States", "Americas" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S11", "title": "World Robotics 2025: Industrial Robots", "publisher": "International Federation of Robotics", "url": "https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/global-robot-demand-in-factories-doubles-over-10-years", "publishedAt": "2025-09-25", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Industrial robots are mainly bounded machines in factories; they are not proof of general-purpose home robots. Installations do not measure autonomy, reliability, task breadth or person-level access. The 2028 number is an industry forecast and could change with investment and trade conditions.", "evidenceClass": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "global", "China", "Japan", "Republic of Korea", "India", "European Union", "United States", "Americas" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-174567d54c35b7311135", "statement": "The ministry also reported that two earlier calls for centre proposals had not selected an applicant, showing that announced capacity can meet commercial and governance obstacles.", "limitations": "Most capacity numbers are planned procurement or construction, not delivered service. A public-private centre does not imply unrestricted person-level access. The source is one national plan and should not be generalised to all of Asia.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S10" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Republic of Korea" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-2c1c18de16305ad36716", "statement": "India reported 34,333 GPUs empanelled through industry partners for common cloud capacity, with published hourly bid prices across multiple accelerator types.", "limitations": "Empanelled capacity is not the same as continuously available capacity. GPU counts do not capture performance differences, networking, storage or software readiness. Government reporting is not evidence that every person can access every listed resource.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S08" ], "basis": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "India" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S08", "title": "India's Common Compute Capacity Crosses 34,000 GPUs", "publisher": "Press Information Bureau, Government of India", "url": "https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2132817&lang=1®=3", "publishedAt": "2025-05-30", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "Empanelled capacity is not the same as continuously available capacity. GPU counts do not capture performance differences, networking, storage or software readiness. Government reporting is not evidence that every person can access every listed resource.", "evidenceClass": "measured-trend", "geographies": [ "India" ] }, { "kind": "claim", "id": "source-claim-36fccea1bab8c3398b14", "statement": "Japan's watt-bit work links data-centre growth with coordinated planning for electricity, telecommunications, location and decarbonisation.", "limitations": "The report states policy direction, not delivered capacity or a public scheduling interface. Moving computation is not always possible because latency, data residency and security matter. Private software cannot replace grid, telecom or land-use planning.", "sourceIds": [ "PC-S09" ], "basis": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Japan" ] }, { "kind": "source", "id": "PC-S09", "title": "Report 1.0 of the Public-Private Advisory Council on Watt-Bit Collaboration Published", "publisher": "Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan", "url": "https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2025/0612_001.html", "publishedAt": "2025-06-12", "accessedAt": "2026-08-02", "limitations": "The report states policy direction, not delivered capacity or a public scheduling interface. Moving computation is not always possible because latency, data residency and security matter. Private software cannot replace grid, telecom or land-use planning.", "evidenceClass": "policy-intent", "geographies": [ "Japan" ] } ], "rankingIndexPath": "rankings/category-004/index.json", "sourceReceipts": [] }